webmd.com
Growth Hormone May Lower Odds of Fractures in Older Women |#Women
WebMD News from HealthDay
But researcher says high cost, need to get shots in clinics make it an unlikely osteoporosis treatment
By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter
THURSDAY,
Aug. 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) -- Older women with osteoporosis could
get lasting benefits from a few years on growth hormone, a new, small
trial suggests.
Researchers found that when women
with the bone-thinning disease took growth hormone for three years,
their fracture risk was still reduced seven years later. Before entering
the study, 56 percent of the women had suffered a bone break; over the
10-year study period, 28 percent sustained a fracture.
But the study, reported online Aug. 27 in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, only involved 55 women who used growth hormone.
And experts said it is unlikely to become an approved treatment for osteoporosis any time soon.
Still,
the results are "pretty exciting," since they show a sustained effect
on women's fracture risk, said Dr. Jerome Tolbert, an endocrinologist at
Mount Sinai Beth Israel in New York City.
"Osteoporosis
is a serious problem, and we need to do a better job of preventing and
treating it," said Tolbert, who was not involved in the study.
However,
more research is needed before growth hormone could become a treatment
option. "Do we need more studies to confirm the safety and
effectiveness? Yes, we do," Tolbert said.
In the
United States, about 52 million people have low bone mass or full-blown
osteoporosis, according to the National Osteoporosis Foundation. And
among women older than 50, roughly half will suffer a fracture due to
thinning bones.
There are a number of bone-protecting medications that can cut that fracture risk, including bisphosphonates such as Actonel, Boniva and Fosamax, plus generics; the injection drugs denosumab (Prolia) and teriparatide (Forteo); and raloxifene (Evista), a pill that has estrogen-like effects on bones.
A recent review found that, overall, the drugs reduce the risk of spine fractures by 40 percent to 60 percent. They also curb the risk of other bone breaks, including hip fractures, by 20 percent to 40 percent.
But while many options exist, Tolbert said he could foresee "a place for growth hormone to fit in."
What's
"interesting," he added, was that it only had to be taken for a finite
amount of time in this trial, and not continuously. So that's a
potential advantage, he said.
Right now, growth hormone is approved to treat just a few medical conditions, including growth hormone deficiency in children and adults.
It
is not approved to remedy the normal decline in growth hormone that
comes with aging. However, some "longevity clinics" have been promoting
growth hormone as a fountain of youth that can increase muscle, trim fat
and improve stamina in aging adults, according to the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA).
For women with
osteoporosis, growth hormone does indeed stimulate bone formation,
according to Dr. Emily Krantz, the lead researcher on the new study.
It
may also enhance muscle mass and balance, which could help women avoid
falls, said Krantz, of Sodra Alvsborgs Hospital in Boras, Sweden.
But there are also risks. According to the FDA, the side effects of growth hormone include fluid retention, joint and muscle pain, and elevated cholesterol and blood sugar. There are also concerns about a potential link to cancer risk.
In
this trial, though, there were few side effects, according to Krantz.
Some women had swelling in their hands and feet, but there were no
lasting effects on blood sugar or cholesterol levels.
The
findings are based on 80 women with osteoporosis who were randomly
assigned to take daily injections of either growth hormone or a placebo for 18 months. After that, the hormone group continued on the treatment for another 18 months. All of the women took calcium and vitamin D.
Krantz's
team also compared the study group with a random sample of 223 women
the same age who did not initially have osteoporosis. Over 10 years, the
rate of bone fracture in that group rose from 8 percent to 32 percent.
In contrast, the study patients saw their fracture rate drop by half over time -- from 56 percent to 28 percent.
That decline, Tolbert said, is "pretty remarkable."
It's
not clear, though, how much of the credit goes to growth hormone. There
was no significant difference in fracture rates between women who'd
used the hormone and those who'd used a placebo. And part of the
benefit, Krantz's team said, could have come from awareness of fall
prevention and other medications that some women took during the
seven-year follow-up.
And in the "real world," there are practical barriers to using growth hormone for osteoporosis -- including its high cost.
"It's unlikely," Krantz acknowledged, "that it will be used [for osteoporosis] in the foreseeable future, because the treatment is so expensive and has to be overseen by a specialist clinic."
Krantz said her team has no plans for a larger trial, but will keep following the patients who've already received growth hormone.
And in the "real world," there are practical barriers to using growth hormone for osteoporosis -- including its high cost.
"It's unlikely," Krantz acknowledged, "that it will be used [for osteoporosis] in the foreseeable future, because the treatment is so expensive and has to be overseen by a specialist clinic."
Krantz said her team has no plans for a larger trial, but will keep following the patients who've already received growth hormone.
No comments:
Post a Comment